There were 589 nano cap outperformers at the start in 2012, 221 micro cap outperformers, 97 small cap outperformers and - - -. They added up to 935 in total. This is different from 446 total global outperformers mentioned in the beginning of the article.
The 935 number is the total number of outperformers, while the 446 number is the number of outperformers that had a market cap above $550M just to minimizing the sample size.
When discussing percent of outperformers starting as nano cap and micro cap companies, the denominator used was 993. I note that Dede Eyesan also used 993 in his PDF report without specifically mentioning it. Any explanation? Thanks.
There were 589 nano cap outperformers at the start in 2012, 221 micro cap outperformers, 97 small cap outperformers and - - -. They added up to 935 in total. This is different from 446 total global outperformers mentioned in the beginning of the article.
ah, now I see.
No clue looked in the report and tried to understand. But couldn't find why. I hope it is just a typo.
Hi again
I talked with Dede.
The 935 number is the total number of outperformers, while the 446 number is the number of outperformers that had a market cap above $550M just to minimizing the sample size.
When discussing percent of outperformers starting as nano cap and micro cap companies, the denominator used was 993. I note that Dede Eyesan also used 993 in his PDF report without specifically mentioning it. Any explanation? Thanks.
Which page are you looking at? Didn't find 993 when I searched in the document.